San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder match player stats from their February 5, 2026 showdown delivered one of the most compelling Western Conference clashes of the NBA season.
The Spurs won 116-106 at home in what became a defining moment in a historic season — two of the West’s elite battling for positioning.
Victor Wembanyama posted a dominant double-double, Keldon Johnson erupted for 25 points, and the Thunder’s Jaylin Williams and Kenrich Williams fought hard in a losing effort.
Game Summary: Spurs 116, Thunder 106 — February 5, 2026
The San Antonio Spurs hosted the Oklahoma City Thunder on February 5, 2026, at the AT&T Center in San Antonio. It was a marquee Western Conference matchup between the No. 2 and No. 1 seeds — and the Spurs delivered a statement performance.
San Antonio won 116-106, handing the Thunder one of their rare losses of the 2025-26 NBA season. The Spurs dominated the opening quarter 39-26 — a 13-point burst that set the tone for the entire game.
The Thunder cut into the deficit in the third quarter, outscoring San Antonio 27-22, but the Spurs’ lead proved too large to erase. Both teams finished the fourth quarter level at 21 apiece, sealing a 10-point San Antonio victory.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score: Spurs vs Thunder
| Quarter | San Antonio Spurs | OKC Thunder |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 39 | 26 |
| Q2 | 34 | 32 |
| Q3 | 22 | 27 |
| Q4 | 21 | 21 |
| Final | 116 | 106 |
The Spurs’ dominant first quarter was the difference. San Antonio’s 39-point opening quarter was explosive — driven by Keldon Johnson’s early scoring burst and Victor Wembanyama asserting himself inside from the opening tip.
The Thunder showed fight in the third quarter with a 27-22 edge, but they could never fully close the gap after the 13-point first quarter deficit. OKC’s biggest lead in this game was zero — they never led at any point.
Full Team Stats: Spurs vs Thunder
| Stat Category | San Antonio Spurs | OKC Thunder |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 116 | 106 |
| Field Goals Made/Att | 45/101 | 37/93 |
| Field Goal % | 44.6% | 39.8% |
| Three-Pointers Made/Att | 14/42 | 19/47 |
| Three-Point % | 33.3% | 40.4% |
| Free Throws Made/Att | 12/20 | 13/14 |
| Free Throw % | 60.0% | 92.9% |
| Total Rebounds | 73 | 49 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 18 | 9 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 45 | 37 |
| Assists | 26 | 26 |
| Steals | 11 | 10 |
| Blocks | 8 | 9 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 14 |
| Points in Paint | 56 | 26 |
| Fast Break Points | 16 | 14 |
| Second Chance Points | 14 | 9 |
| Bench Points | 52 | 22 |
| Biggest Lead | 22 | 0 |
| Effective FG% | 51.5% | 50.0% |
| Offensive Rating | 109.6 | 101.8 |
| Defensive Rating | 101.8 | 109.6 |
The most glaring difference was in the paint. San Antonio dominated with 56 points in the paint compared to just 26 for OKC — a 30-point discrepancy that tells the story of the game. Wembanyama and the Spurs interior attack simply overwhelmed the Thunder on the inside.
The Spurs also dominated the boards with 73 total rebounds versus 49 for Oklahoma City. San Antonio grabbed 18 offensive rebounds — double OKC’s 9 — generating 14 second chance points compared to the Thunder’s 9.
The bench was another massive edge for San Antonio. The Spurs’ bench outscored OKC’s bench 52-22 — a 30-point bench advantage that gave Oklahoma City no margin for error when their starters struggled.
San Antonio Spurs Individual Player Stats
Victor Wembanyama
Victor Wembanyama was the anchor for San Antonio’s victory over the Thunder. He posted 22 points and 14 rebounds — a commanding double-double that demonstrated exactly why he is considered the most unique player in the NBA.
Wembanyama shot 56.3% from the field (9-of-16), added 2 blocks, 2 assists, and finished with a team-best plus-17 in plus/minus. He scored 14 points in the paint and was a force on both ends of the floor — holding his man to limited production while generating easy looks for teammates in transition.
His offensive rating of 111.7 and efficiency score of 29 led San Antonio in the key advanced metrics that define elite two-way play.
| Stat | Victor Wembanyama |
|---|---|
| Points | 22 |
| Rebounds | 14 (3 OFF, 11 DEF) |
| Assists | 2 |
| Blocks | 2 |
| Field Goals | 9/16 (56.3%) |
| Three-Pointers | 1/2 (50.0%) |
| Free Throws | 3/8 (37.5%) |
| Points in Paint | 14 |
| Plus/Minus | +17 |
| Efficiency Score | 29 |
| True Shooting % | 56.4% |
| Offensive Rating | 111.7 |
Keldon Johnson
Keldon Johnson was the Spurs’ leading scorer with 25 points — and he was absolutely on fire from every area of the court. Johnson shot 58.8% from the field (10-of-17) and 50% from three-point range (4-of-8), adding 6 rebounds and 2 assists in a performance that perfectly complemented Wembanyama’s work inside.
His true shooting percentage of 69.9% was the best among all players on the floor. Johnson scored 12 points in the paint, hit 4 threes, and posted an offensive rating of 147.8 — the highest in the game by a wide margin.
| Stat | Keldon Johnson |
|---|---|
| Points | 25 |
| Rebounds | 6 (1 OFF, 5 DEF) |
| Assists | 2 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Field Goals | 10/17 (58.8%) |
| Three-Pointers | 4/8 (50.0%) |
| Free Throws | 1/2 (50.0%) |
| Points in Paint | 12 |
| Plus/Minus | +8 |
| Efficiency Score | 26 |
| True Shooting % | 69.9% |
| Offensive Rating | 147.8 |
Luke Kornet
Luke Kornet did not fill the stat sheet with points — he had just 4 — but he was quietly one of the most impactful Spurs players in the matchup. Kornet pulled down 15 rebounds (9 offensive, 6 defensive), giving San Antonio repeated second-chance opportunities throughout the game.
His offensive rebound percentage of 51.9% was extraordinary. Kornet essentially gave the Spurs an extra possession every time the starter’s shot missed, and his 43.6% total rebound rate was the highest of any player in the game.
| Stat | Luke Kornet |
|---|---|
| Points | 4 |
| Rebounds | 15 (9 OFF, 6 DEF) |
| Assists | 2 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Field Goals | 2/7 (28.6%) |
| Points in Paint | 4 |
| Second Chance Points | 2 |
| Offensive Rebound % | 51.9% |
| Total Rebound % | 43.6% |
| Efficiency Score | 17 |
Carter Bryant
Carter Bryant was one of San Antonio’s most efficient contributors off the bench. He scored 11 points while shooting 44.4% from the field and a perfect 50% from three-point range (3-of-6), adding 5 rebounds, 2 steals, and 1 assist.
Bryant’s effective field goal percentage of 61.1% was the second-highest among Spurs starters and bench contributors. He was a key part of the bench unit that outscored OKC’s reserves by 30 points.
| Stat | Carter Bryant |
|---|---|
| Points | 11 |
| Rebounds | 5 (1 OFF, 4 DEF) |
| Assists | 1 |
| Steals | 2 |
| Field Goals | 4/9 (44.4%) |
| Three-Pointers | 3/6 (50.0%) |
| Effective FG% | 61.1% |
| Plus/Minus | +6 |
| Efficiency Score | 10 |
Harrison Barnes
Harrison Barnes contributed 9 points on 33.3% shooting along with a solid 7 rebounds and 2 blocks. While his shooting was off in this game, Barnes provided valuable defensive presence and leadership — particularly in the third quarter when OKC threatened to cut into the lead.
| Stat | Harrison Barnes |
|---|---|
| Points | 9 |
| Rebounds | 7 (2 OFF, 5 DEF) |
| Assists | 1 |
| Blocks | 2 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Field Goals | 3/9 (33.3%) |
| Three-Pointers | 2/7 (28.6%) |
| Efficiency Score | 8 |
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie had a quiet but efficient night with 8 points on 50% shooting, 5 rebounds, and a team-high tying 3 assists. His effective field goal percentage was 66.7%, and he connected on 2 of 5 threes while logging a plus-13 rating — one of the best on the team.
| Stat | Julian Champagnie |
|---|---|
| Points | 8 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Field Goals | 3/6 (50.0%) |
| Three-Pointers | 2/5 (40.0%) |
| Plus/Minus | +13 |
| Effective FG% | 66.7% |
Devin Vassell
Devin Vassell had a difficult shooting night, connecting on just 2 of 10 shots for 5 points. He did add 3 rebounds and a steal, but his 20% field goal percentage and minus-4 rating made this an off-night for the Spurs guard.
| Stat | Devin Vassell |
|---|---|
| Points | 5 |
| Rebounds | 3 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Field Goals | 2/10 (20.0%) |
| Three-Pointers | 1/7 (14.3%) |
| Plus/Minus | -4 |
| True Shooting % | 25.0% |
Jordan McLaughlin
Jordan McLaughlin played a limited role but contributed 3 points including a three-pointer, 1 assist, and 1 steal in his minutes. He posted a team-best offensive rating of 124.7 in a short sample.
| Stat | Jordan McLaughlin |
|---|---|
| Points | 3 |
| Rebounds | 1 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Field Goals | 1/3 (33.3%) |
| Three-Pointers | 1/1 (100%) |
| Offensive Rating | 124.7 |
San Antonio Spurs Full Player Stats Summary
| Player | POS | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG% | 3P% | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keldon Johnson | F-G | 25 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 58.8% | 50.0% | +8 |
| Victor Wembanyama | C | 22 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 56.3% | 50.0% | +17 |
| Carter Bryant | F | 11 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 44.4% | 50.0% | +6 |
| Harrison Barnes | F | 9 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% | 28.6% | 0 |
| Julian Champagnie | F | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% | 40.0% | +13 |
| Devin Vassell | F | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20.0% | 14.3% | -4 |
| Luke Kornet | C-F | 4 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 28.6% | — | -4 |
| Jordan McLaughlin | G | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% | 100% | -2 |
Oklahoma City Thunder Individual Player Stats
Kenrich Williams — OKC Leading Scorer
Kenrich Williams led the Thunder with 25 points in what was his best individual performance of the game. He shot 50% from the field (9-of-18) and hit 4 of 7 three-pointers at 57.1%, pulling down 9 rebounds and distributing 2 assists.
Despite the strong individual numbers, Williams posted a minus-12 rating — a reflection of the fact that San Antonio’s overall team execution overwhelmed Oklahoma City on every other front. His efficiency score of 27 was the highest among all Thunder players.
| Stat | Kenrich Williams |
|---|---|
| Points | 25 |
| Rebounds | 9 (2 OFF, 7 DEF) |
| Assists | 2 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Turnovers | 3 |
| Field Goals | 9/18 (50.0%) |
| Three-Pointers | 4/7 (57.1%) |
| Free Throws | 3/4 (75.0%) |
| Plus/Minus | -12 |
| Efficiency Score | 27 |
| True Shooting % | 63.3% |
Jaylin Williams — Double-Double
Jaylin Williams was OKC’s most complete player in the loss. He registered a double-double with 24 points and 12 rebounds while shooting a perfect 8-of-8 from the free throw line. Williams attempted 11 three-pointers, converting 4, and brought veteran-level reliability to the Thunder’s second unit.
His efficiency score of 32 was the highest of any player in the game — higher even than Wembanyama — though the plus/minus told a harder story at minus-14.
| Stat | Jaylin Williams |
|---|---|
| Points | 24 |
| Rebounds | 12 (0 OFF, 12 DEF) |
| Assists | 4 |
| Blocks | 2 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Field Goals | 6/15 (40.0%) |
| Three-Pointers | 4/11 (36.4%) |
| Free Throws | 8/8 (100%) |
| Plus/Minus | -14 |
| Efficiency Score | 32 |
| True Shooting % | 64.8% |
Brooks Barnhizer
Barnhizer scored 14 points and dished 5 assists but shot only 33.3% from the field (5-of-15). He was 4-of-9 from three-point range — respectable shooting from distance — but his struggles inside the arc limited his overall effectiveness. He finished at minus-11.
| Stat | Brooks Barnhizer |
|---|---|
| Points | 14 |
| Rebounds | 3 (1 OFF, 2 DEF) |
| Assists | 5 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Field Goals | 5/15 (33.3%) |
| Three-Pointers | 4/9 (44.4%) |
| Plus/Minus | -11 |
| Efficiency Score | 4 |
Cason Wallace
Cason Wallace had 13 points and 5 assists but was charged with 3 turnovers and 4 fouls. He shot 37.5% from the field and 20% from three, and his minus-15 was the worst plus/minus on the Thunder roster in this game.
| Stat | Cason Wallace |
|---|---|
| Points | 13 |
| Rebounds | 3 (1 OFF, 2 DEF) |
| Assists | 5 |
| Steals | 3 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Turnovers | 3 |
| Field Goals | 6/16 (37.5%) |
| Three-Pointers | 1/5 (20.0%) |
| Plus/Minus | -15 |
| True Shooting % | 40.6% |
Chris Youngblood
Youngblood had 5 points, 3 rebounds, and 2 assists while serving as a secondary playmaker for OKC. He connected on 2 of 6 shots and hit one three-pointer. His 2 blocks were a defensive highlight.
| Stat | Chris Youngblood |
|---|---|
| Points | 5 |
| Rebounds | 3 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Blocks | 2 |
| Field Goals | 2/6 (33.3%) |
| Three-Pointers | 1/4 (25.0%) |
| Plus/Minus | -3 |
Branden Carlson
Carlson was a bright spot off the bench with solid hustle numbers. He scored just 3 points but collected 7 rebounds (3 offensive), added 2 blocks, and posted a team-best plus-10 for OKC — the only positive plus/minus on the Thunder squad.
| Stat | Branden Carlson |
|---|---|
| Points | 3 |
| Rebounds | 7 (3 OFF, 4 DEF) |
| Blocks | 2 |
| Field Goals | 1/2 (50.0%) |
| Three-Pointers | 1/1 (100%) |
| Plus/Minus | +10 |
| Offensive Rebound % | 16.7% |
Oklahoma City Thunder Full Player Stats Summary
| Player | POS | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG% | 3P% | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenrich Williams | F | 25 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% | 57.1% | -12 |
| Jaylin Williams | C | 24 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 40.0% | 36.4% | -14 |
| Brooks Barnhizer | G | 14 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 44.4% | -11 |
| Cason Wallace | G | 13 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 37.5% | 20.0% | -15 |
| Chris Youngblood | G | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% | 25.0% | -3 |
| Branden Carlson | C | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% | 100% | +10 |
Key Matchup Highlights: Spurs vs Thunder
Points in Paint Domination
The most decisive statistical category in the San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder match player stats was points in the paint. San Antonio scored 56 points in the paint compared to Oklahoma City’s 26 — a dominant 30-point advantage.
Wembanyama scored 14 of those points alone, with Keldon Johnson adding 12 more inside. The Spurs shot 56.1% at the rim (23-of-41). OKC shot just 40.0% at the rim (8-of-20).
This interior dominance was the structural reason OKC could never stay close despite matching the Spurs in three-point makes (19 vs 14) and three-point percentage (40.4% vs 33.3%).
Bench Production Gap
The bench scoring was one of the most lopsided elements of the Spurs vs Thunder player stats matchup. San Antonio’s bench contributed 52 points. Oklahoma City’s bench contributed just 22 points.
That 30-point bench margin meant OKC’s starters were essentially fighting a two-front war — trying to outscore San Antonio’s starters while also absorbing the damage from a deep, energized Spurs bench unit.
Offensive Rebounding Edge
San Antonio grabbed 18 offensive rebounds to OKC’s 9. Luke Kornet alone hauled in 9 offensive boards — matching the entire Thunder team’s offensive rebounding total.
Those 18 offensive rebounds generated 14 second chance points for the Spurs. It was relentless — every OKC miss by the Spurs became a potential second or third possession.
Turnover Parity
Both teams committed exactly 14 turnovers, making this one area where neither team had a clear advantage. However, OKC converted 15 points off Spurs turnovers compared to San Antonio’s 12 points off Thunder turnovers — a slight edge for Oklahoma City that was more than canceled out by every other category.
NBA Western Conference Standings After the Game
This San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder matchup had significant Western Conference implications. Here is where both teams stand in the 2025-26 NBA standings.
| Team | W | L | Win% | Conference Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma City Thunder | 49 | 15 | .766 | 1st — Western Conference |
| San Antonio Spurs | 44 | 17 | .721 | 2nd — Western Conference |
| Houston Rockets | 38 | 22 | .633 | 3rd — Western Conference |
| Minnesota Timberwolves | 39 | 23 | .629 | 4th — Western Conference |
| Denver Nuggets | 38 | 24 | .613 | 5th — Western Conference |
The Thunder lead the West at 49-15, but the Spurs — at 44-17 — are firmly the No. 2 seed and remain within striking distance. This game showed that San Antonio is fully capable of beating Oklahoma City on any given night, adding enormous drama to a potential Western Conference playoff matchup.
Spurs vs Thunder: Season Series Context
The San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder matchup on February 5, 2026, was one of the most closely watched games of the season given both teams’ standings. The Spurs’ ability to dominate the interior and use their bench depth against the NBA’s best team was a massive statement.
San Antonio’s biggest lead in the game was 22 points — a commanding margin that demonstrated the Spurs were in full control for much of the contest.
Oklahoma City never held a lead the entire game. Their biggest run of the night was 8 consecutive points at one stage, briefly cutting the deficit — but San Antonio answered every time.
Victor Wembanyama vs OKC — A Growing Rivalry
Wembanyama’s performance against the Thunder continues a pattern — he consistently elevates his game against the league’s best teams and best defenses.
In this matchup he finished with 22 points on 56.3% shooting, 14 rebounds, 2 assists, and 2 blocks. He had an impact across every category and was the primary reason the Thunder’s interior defense was stretched and unable to contain San Antonio’s paint attack.
His offensive rating of 111.7 and plus/minus of +17 were both team-best marks, cementing his status as the most impactful player on the floor in this Spurs vs Thunder showdown.
San Antonio Spurs 2025-26 Season Form
The Spurs have been one of the biggest stories of the 2025-26 NBA season. Their 44-17 record puts them on pace for one of the best seasons in franchise history post-Tim Duncan.
Recent results show a team that has hit a high level of consistent performance. San Antonio beat the Los Angeles Lakers 136-108, Golden State Warriors 126-113, Sacramento Kings 139-122, and Philadelphia 76ers 131-91 in February alone. The Spurs are playing with cohesion, depth, and Wembanyama anchoring everything.
| Recent SAS Results | Score | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| vs Philadelphia 76ers | 131-91 | Win |
| vs Brooklyn Nets | 126-110 | Win |
| vs Detroit Pistons | 114-103 | Win |
| vs Golden State Warriors | 126-113 | Win |
| vs Los Angeles Lakers | 136-108 | Win |
| vs OKC Thunder | 116-106 | Win |
| vs Sacramento Kings | 139-122 | Win |
Oklahoma City Thunder 2025-26 Season Form
The Thunder remain the best team in the Western Conference despite this loss to San Antonio. Their 49-15 record is the best mark in the West and one of the best in the entire NBA.
OKC’s loss to the Spurs was one of their very few defeats of the season. The absence of key rotation players — most notably Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (SGA), who did not appear in the player stats data for this game — made a significant difference in Oklahoma City’s ability to compete against a deep Spurs team at full strength.
This San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder match player stats output underscores that the Thunder are clearly the team to beat in the West — but the Spurs are the team most likely to knock them off their perch.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What was the final score of the Spurs vs Thunder game on February 5, 2026?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Oklahoma City Thunder 116-106 at the AT&T Center in San Antonio. The Spurs led by as many as 22 points during the contest.
Who was the leading scorer for the Spurs vs Thunder match?
Keldon Johnson led the Spurs with 25 points on 58.8% shooting. Victor Wembanyama added 22 points and 14 rebounds for a dominant double-double performance.
Who led the Thunder in scoring against the Spurs?
Kenrich Williams topped OKC with 25 points on 50% field goal shooting and 4 three-pointers made. Jaylin Williams added 24 points and 12 rebounds in a losing double-double effort.
How did Victor Wembanyama perform against the OKC Thunder?
Wembanyama posted 22 points, 14 rebounds, 2 assists, and 2 blocks while shooting 56.3% from the field. He recorded a plus-17 and led all players with an offensive rating of 111.7.
What was the points-in-paint difference in the Spurs vs Thunder game?
San Antonio dominated the paint with 56 points compared to OKC’s 26 — a massive 30-point advantage that was the defining statistical edge in the Spurs’ 10-point victory.
How did the bench units compare in the Spurs vs Thunder match player stats?
San Antonio’s bench outscored Oklahoma City’s bench 52-22 — a 30-point difference. The Spurs’ depth was a critical factor that OKC could not overcome throughout the game.
Did any player record a double-double in the Spurs vs Thunder game?
Yes, two players recorded double-doubles. Victor Wembanyama had 22 points and 14 rebounds for San Antonio, while Jaylin Williams had 24 points and 12 rebounds for Oklahoma City.
What are the NBA Western Conference standings after this game?
Oklahoma City leads the West at 49-15 (.766). San Antonio sits second at 44-17 (.721). The two teams are separated by 5 games in the loss column with the playoffs approaching.
How many offensive rebounds did the Spurs grab against the Thunder?
San Antonio grabbed 18 offensive rebounds compared to OKC’s 9. Luke Kornet alone pulled down 9 offensive boards — matching the entire Thunder team’s offensive rebounding total.
When do the Spurs and Thunder next play each other?
Based on the 2025-26 NBA regular season schedule, any further San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder matchups will be confirmed on the official NBA schedule. Both teams are likely to meet again in the Western Conference playoffs given their top-2 seedings.
Conclusion
The San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder match player stats from February 5, 2026, told the story of a complete team performance from San Antonio against the West’s best. Keldon Johnson’s 25-point explosion, Victor Wembanyama’s dominant double-double, Luke Kornet’s absurd 15-rebound performance, and a 30-point bench scoring advantage gave the Spurs a commanding 116-106 victory.
Oklahoma City fought hard — Kenrich Williams and Jaylin Williams each had strong nights individually — but San Antonio’s paint dominance, offensive rebounding, and bench depth proved insurmountable.
With the Spurs sitting at 44-17 and the Thunder at 49-15, the Western Conference playoff race is shaping up to be one of the most compelling storylines of the 2025-26 NBA season. A postseason rematch between these two teams could be the defining series of the NBA playoffs.
