Texas stands at the forefront of autonomous vehicle regulation, and the latest study from the Texas Law Dog details how state and federal frameworks shape robotaxi expansion—and safety.
Texas SB 2205: The Nation’s First AV Reporting Law
- Mandates that all robotaxi tests log disengagement events and malfunction data.
- Requires public incident disclosure via the “AV TEST Dashboard,” fostering transparency.
- Since implementation, Austin has reported 120 AV incidents over two years; 45 so far in 2025.
Federal Oversight: NHTSA & Automated Vehicle Framework
- The NHTSA opened probes into Tesla robotaxis after multiple collisions, issuing requests for voluntary safety case filings.
- Waymo recalled 1,200 vehicles in 2025 for barrier-collision risks.
- Cruise faces federal investigation after a pedestrian fatality in San Francisco.
National Comparisons
State | AV Adoption Rank | Incident Rate (%) |
California | 1 | 7.9 |
Texas | 2 | 7.5 |
Arizona | 5 | 6.2 |
Florida | 7 | 5.8 |
Texas’s higher incident reporting rate reflects stronger public-disclosure mandates, not necessarily lower safety standards.
Liability & Legal Exposure
- AV collisions raise complex questions of fault among manufacturers, software providers, and fleet operators.
- Under Texas law, compliance with SB 2205 disclosures can mitigate punitive damages but may increase discovery burdens in civil suits.
First-Responder Challenges
Emergency crews report difficulty disabling stalled robotaxis, delaying lane clearance by 25 percent compared to human-driver crashes.
Emerging Proposals
- Remote Human Monitoring: Legislators are debating a requirement for constant off-site supervision to intervene during malfunctions.
- Unified Crash Database: A proposal to integrate NHTSA, state DMV, and operator data into a single portal.
- Minimum Response Standards: Guidelines for first responders on AV shutdown protocols within 5 minutes of arrival.
Texas leads the robotaxi rollout, with active pilots in Austin and planned expansions to Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio.
Texas Law Dog’s study concludes that robust regulation—balancing safety, innovation, and transparency—will determine whether Texas remains an AV leader or falls behind more agile jurisdictions.